Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX11 benchmark released Enhances 3D Vision support and adds Surround + more
  1 / 2    
I'm sure some of you caught this elsewhere, but Unigine launched Heaven 3.0 a couple of days ago now with a number of changes and improvements. Aside from some obvious NVIDIA specific enhancements, 3.0 also means you can now run it on your Mac and your Sandy Bridge IGP :P

[list][*]Added Mac OS X version compatible with 10.7+ (no tessellation).
[*]Added support for Intel HD 3000 GPU (no tessellation).
[*]Improved support for multi-monitor configurations.
[*]Added support for NVIDIA 3D Surround (multi-monitor stereo 3D).
[*]Enhanced NVIDIA 3D Vision support.
[*]New cross-platform launcher without .NET dependencies.
[*]Fixed Phoronix Test Suite compatibility issue.
[*]Fixed minor visual artifacts.
[*]Improved compatibility with Mesa drivers.
[*]Improved detection of new GPUs.
[/list]
[url="http://unigine.com/press-releases/120307-heaven-benchmark-3.0/"]Press Release[/url] and [url="http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/"]Download Area[/url].


J
I'm sure some of you caught this elsewhere, but Unigine launched Heaven 3.0 a couple of days ago now with a number of changes and improvements. Aside from some obvious NVIDIA specific enhancements, 3.0 also means you can now run it on your Mac and your Sandy Bridge IGP :P



  • Added Mac OS X version compatible with 10.7+ (no tessellation).
  • Added support for Intel HD 3000 GPU (no tessellation).
  • Improved support for multi-monitor configurations.
  • Added support for NVIDIA 3D Surround (multi-monitor stereo 3D).
  • Enhanced NVIDIA 3D Vision support.
  • New cross-platform launcher without .NET dependencies.
  • Fixed Phoronix Test Suite compatibility issue.
  • Fixed minor visual artifacts.
  • Improved compatibility with Mesa drivers.
  • Improved detection of new GPUs.


Press Release and Download Area.





J

Official GeForce Forums Benchmarking Leaderboards
NVIDIA SLI Technology: A Canine's Guide

Corsair Obsidian 350D mATX, Asus Maximus VI GENE Z87 mATX, Intel Core i7-4770k @ 4.40GHz, Corsair H110, Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB (4x4GB) @ 2400MHz, 1x OCZ Vertex 4 256GB, 1x WD Scorpio Black 750GB, 2x WD Caviar Black 1TB, EVGA GeForce GTX 780Ti Superclock, Enermax 1250W Evolution, Windows 8 64bit.

Logitech G9x, Razer Black Widow Ultimate, Logitech G930, 2x Eizo EV2333W.

Twitter | Steam

#1
Posted 03/09/2012 03:23 PM   
i got asus gtx580 dcu ii reference and in unigine benchmark 3.0 my fram rate score is 34.5 !

its good or normal or its low !?????

in 1920X108o
8xaa
tesselation extream
anistrofic filter 16X

everythings ultra !

please some one answer !
i got asus gtx580 dcu ii reference and in unigine benchmark 3.0 my fram rate score is 34.5 !



its good or normal or its low !?????



in 1920X108o

8xaa

tesselation extream

anistrofic filter 16X



everythings ultra !



please some one answer !

INTEL IVY BRIDGE COREI5 3570K @ 3.4 GHZ / ASROCK Z68 EXTREME 3 GEN 3 / 2X 4G CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR3 1600 CL9 /
ASUS GTX 770 oc DCII 2048 / 1X WD 1-TB SATA2 CAVIER GREEN / CORSAIR H70 HYDRO CPU COOLER / ANTEC THWELVEHUNDRED II CASE / Antec 900w CHP gaming PSU / 22" SAMSUNG BX2285 PLUS

#2
Posted 04/14/2012 10:53 AM   
[quote name='Darkwish' date='14 April 2012 - 04:53 AM' timestamp='1334400813' post='1396201']
i got asus gtx580 dcu ii reference and in unigine benchmark 3.0 my fram rate score is 34.5 !

its good or normal or its low !?????

in 1920X108o
8xaa
tesselation extream
anistrofic filter 16X

everythings ultra !

please some one answer !
[/quote]

Really shoulda just posted in your own topic instead of posting everywhere about this dude. Your score is fine, 580s score between 30-35FPS depending on clocks & system specs on Extreme.

Jimbon: Perhaps we should setup a leaderboard for this with the same constraints as the 2.1 board, and lock that one (cuz I'm not maintaining it anymore, and the people I had helping me maintain it don't come here anymore)
[quote name='Darkwish' date='14 April 2012 - 04:53 AM' timestamp='1334400813' post='1396201']

i got asus gtx580 dcu ii reference and in unigine benchmark 3.0 my fram rate score is 34.5 !



its good or normal or its low !?????



in 1920X108o

8xaa

tesselation extream

anistrofic filter 16X



everythings ultra !



please some one answer !





Really shoulda just posted in your own topic instead of posting everywhere about this dude. Your score is fine, 580s score between 30-35FPS depending on clocks & system specs on Extreme.



Jimbon: Perhaps we should setup a leaderboard for this with the same constraints as the 2.1 board, and lock that one (cuz I'm not maintaining it anymore, and the people I had helping me maintain it don't come here anymore)



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#3
Posted 04/14/2012 07:01 PM   
Yaaa, new benchmark chart. Whens this going to start?
Yaaa, new benchmark chart. Whens this going to start?
#4
Posted 04/15/2012 07:41 AM   
[quote name='cravinmild' date='15 April 2012 - 01:41 AM' timestamp='1334475706' post='1396568']
Yaaa, new benchmark chart. Whens this going to start?
[/quote]

I'll wait for JimBon to respond, see how he wants to go about it, since the last chart ended up in disarray due to lack of maintaince after Dred dropped off because of having to move and stuff, and I got busy with real life crap, it hasn't been firmly updated in months... I imagine Jim will want the 3.0 chart to be official like the 3DMark ones meaning he maintains it on his Google Docs...

I already have some sexy numbers from it though, check this beeswax out:

[img]http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/Heaven3Ex-2x7970s-1125MHz-98point6fps.jpg[/img]

'nough said.
[quote name='cravinmild' date='15 April 2012 - 01:41 AM' timestamp='1334475706' post='1396568']

Yaaa, new benchmark chart. Whens this going to start?





I'll wait for JimBon to respond, see how he wants to go about it, since the last chart ended up in disarray due to lack of maintaince after Dred dropped off because of having to move and stuff, and I got busy with real life crap, it hasn't been firmly updated in months... I imagine Jim will want the 3.0 chart to be official like the 3DMark ones meaning he maintains it on his Google Docs...



I already have some sexy numbers from it though, check this beeswax out:



Image



'nough said.



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#5
Posted 04/15/2012 09:25 AM   
@Honey Badger
That is not sexy enough! Can you please provide us with a inBenchResult picture?
If you don´t know what i mean, check out this Thread from germany: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html

regards
@Honey Badger

That is not sexy enough! Can you please provide us with a inBenchResult picture?

If you don´t know what i mean, check out this Thread from germany: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html



regards

System:

2x GeForce GTX580 1.5GB @ SLI (Zotac: 772/2004MHz & Gainward: 783/2010MHz)

AMD FX-8150 @ stock (3.6GHz/3.9GHz/4.2GHz)

MSI 990FXA-GD80 v2.2 (Bios v11.9)

2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance blue DDR3-1866 CL9 1T

Samsung 37" LCD-TV LE37A550P1R

Win7 Pro. 64Bit SP1 / Win8 64Bit consumer preview

onboard HD sound

#6
Posted 04/15/2012 11:39 AM   
[quote name='WindHund80' date='15 April 2012 - 05:39 AM' timestamp='1334489991' post='1396625']
@Honey Badger
That is not sexy enough! Can you please provide us with a inBenchResult picture?
If you don´t know what i mean, check out this Thread from germany: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html

regards
[/quote]

Uh, not to be a jerk but, why? This is how results have been posted on these forums to date, screenshot wise. I can spot a phoney a mileaway because I know what pretty much any modern card should be capable of because I've seen SO MANY results from this benchmark's 2.1 encarnation. It's also very in line with my stock score, which is about 91FPS.

Also questioning the screenshot integrity of someone that's been around as long as I have and posts as much as I do is pretty weaksauce. lol /just sayin'
[quote name='WindHund80' date='15 April 2012 - 05:39 AM' timestamp='1334489991' post='1396625']

@Honey Badger

That is not sexy enough! Can you please provide us with a inBenchResult picture?

If you don´t know what i mean, check out this Thread from germany: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html



regards





Uh, not to be a jerk but, why? This is how results have been posted on these forums to date, screenshot wise. I can spot a phoney a mileaway because I know what pretty much any modern card should be capable of because I've seen SO MANY results from this benchmark's 2.1 encarnation. It's also very in line with my stock score, which is about 91FPS.



Also questioning the screenshot integrity of someone that's been around as long as I have and posts as much as I do is pretty weaksauce. lol /just sayin'



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#7
Posted 04/15/2012 02:08 PM   
To show I wasn't posting that just to be an arse, here's my new run with my new clocks (I'll list them after the screenshot):

(Clickable Thumbnail, loads the full sized image on Photobucket)
[URL=http://s729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/?action=view&current=Heaven3-2x7970s-1150core-1550vram-101point8FPS.jpg][IMG]http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/th_Heaven3-2x7970s-1150core-1550vram-101point8FPS.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

FPS: 101.8
Score: 2564

i7 2600k @ 4.6GHz 46x100 1.36V (Corsair H100 Cooled)
2x4GB G.Skill RipJawsX @ 2133MHz 9-12-9-29-1T 1.645V
2x Sapphire HD 7970 OCs @ Core: 1150MHz (1.25V), vRAM: 1550MHz

Need anything else O_o lol
To show I wasn't posting that just to be an arse, here's my new run with my new clocks (I'll list them after the screenshot):



(Clickable Thumbnail, loads the full sized image on Photobucket)

Image



FPS: 101.8

Score: 2564



i7 2600k @ 4.6GHz 46x100 1.36V (Corsair H100 Cooled)

2x4GB G.Skill RipJawsX @ 2133MHz 9-12-9-29-1T 1.645V

2x Sapphire HD 7970 OCs @ Core: 1150MHz (1.25V), vRAM: 1550MHz



Need anything else O_o lol



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#8
Posted 04/15/2012 02:34 PM   
[quote name='Honey Badger' date='15 April 2012 - 07:08 AM' timestamp='1334498915' post='1396652']
Uh, not to be a jerk but, why? This is how results have been posted on these forums to date, screenshot wise. I can spot a phoney a mileaway because I know what pretty much any modern card should be capable of because I've seen SO MANY results from this benchmark's 2.1 encarnation. It's also very in line with my stock score, which is about 91FPS.

Also questioning the screenshot integrity of someone that's been around as long as I have and posts as much as I do is pretty weaksauce. lol /just sayin'
[/quote]


/thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />
[quote name='Honey Badger' date='15 April 2012 - 07:08 AM' timestamp='1334498915' post='1396652']

Uh, not to be a jerk but, why? This is how results have been posted on these forums to date, screenshot wise. I can spot a phoney a mileaway because I know what pretty much any modern card should be capable of because I've seen SO MANY results from this benchmark's 2.1 encarnation. It's also very in line with my stock score, which is about 91FPS.



Also questioning the screenshot integrity of someone that's been around as long as I have and posts as much as I do is pretty weaksauce. lol /just sayin'







/thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />

Corsair C70 case, ASUS Sabertooth X58,Intel i7 970 6 core cpu, 24gigs Avant memory, PNY GTX 680 4GB, Corsair AX1200 psu with sleeved cables, Sound Blaster Z, 2 LG Blu-Ray, 2 Crucial M500 120GB SSD, 1 Seagate 500GB HDD, 1 Western Digital VelociRaptor 1TB HDD, Microsoft SideWinder X4 keyboard, Corsair M65 mouse, Xbox 360 controller, Logitech 5.1 speakers, LG 27" IPS LED monitor, 3 Noctua 120mm fans, 2 Noctua 140mm fans, 1 Noctua 92mm fan, Noctua NH-C12P SE14 140mm SSO cpu cooler. Windows 7 Pro 64 bit. GPU has a small overclock by me.

#9
Posted 04/17/2012 04:02 AM   
[quote name='Honey Badger' date='15 April 2012 - 02:34 PM' timestamp='1334500469' post='1396657']
To show I wasn't posting that just to be an arse, here's my new run with my new clocks (I'll list them after the screenshot):

(Clickable Thumbnail, loads the full sized image on Photobucket)
[URL=http://s729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/?action=view&current=Heaven3-2x7970s-1150core-1550vram-101point8FPS.jpg][IMG]http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/th_Heaven3-2x7970s-1150core-1550vram-101point8FPS.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

FPS: 101.8
Score: 2564

i7 2600k @ 4.6GHz 46x100 1.36V (Corsair H100 Cooled)
2x4GB G.Skill RipJawsX @ 2133MHz 9-12-9-29-1T 1.645V
2x Sapphire HD 7970 OCs @ Core: 1150MHz (1.25V), vRAM: 1550MHz

Need anything else O_o lol
[/quote]
Don´t beat arround the bush!
You will explain me that 2xAMD Radeon7970@1350-1800 and a Core i7 3960X@5.0GHz will have a lower minimum FPS as your I7 2600K@4.6GHz?
Source: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html#post18669638


I´m really sorry but i don´t belive your result! /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />
[quote name='Honey Badger' date='15 April 2012 - 02:34 PM' timestamp='1334500469' post='1396657']

To show I wasn't posting that just to be an arse, here's my new run with my new clocks (I'll list them after the screenshot):



(Clickable Thumbnail, loads the full sized image on Photobucket)

Image



FPS: 101.8

Score: 2564



i7 2600k @ 4.6GHz 46x100 1.36V (Corsair H100 Cooled)

2x4GB G.Skill RipJawsX @ 2133MHz 9-12-9-29-1T 1.645V

2x Sapphire HD 7970 OCs @ Core: 1150MHz (1.25V), vRAM: 1550MHz



Need anything else O_o lol



Don´t beat arround the bush!

You will explain me that 2xAMD Radeon7970@1350-1800 and a Core i7 3960X@5.0GHz will have a lower minimum FPS as your I7 2600K@4.6GHz?

Source: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html#post18669638





I´m really sorry but i don´t belive your result! /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />

System:

2x GeForce GTX580 1.5GB @ SLI (Zotac: 772/2004MHz & Gainward: 783/2010MHz)

AMD FX-8150 @ stock (3.6GHz/3.9GHz/4.2GHz)

MSI 990FXA-GD80 v2.2 (Bios v11.9)

2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance blue DDR3-1866 CL9 1T

Samsung 37" LCD-TV LE37A550P1R

Win7 Pro. 64Bit SP1 / Win8 64Bit consumer preview

onboard HD sound

#10
Posted 04/17/2012 06:37 PM   
[quote name='WindHund80' date='17 April 2012 - 12:37 PM' timestamp='1334687876' post='1397540']
Don´t beat arround the bush!
You will explain me that 2xAMD Radeon7970@1350-1800 and a Core i7 3960X@5.0GHz will have a lower minimum FPS as your I7 2600K@4.6GHz?
Source: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html#post18669638


I´m really sorry but i don´t belive your result! /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />
[/quote]

Honestly I don't give a hoot if you believe my result or not. It's legit & 100% correct. Also, if you were paying attention to the screenshots, you'd see he's running older drivers than I am (I'm running 12.4Betas, which are only available if you search & find them, because they aren't officially released yet by AMD, from the looks of it he's running 12.1 or 12.2 drivers). Driver refinements = higher lower FPS typically. You fail at reading. /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />

Also, doing things as simple as disabling Virus Scanner & In-Game/Bench Temps/stats display can increase your result a tiny bit in the Extreme Preset. Who knows what background processes he had running. I can tell you Processor makes almost no difference in the Extreme Preset. I've seen people with 5GHz Hexas lose to 4.5GHz Hexas, simply because the Extreme Preset cares more about GPU clocks than anything else.
[quote name='WindHund80' date='17 April 2012 - 12:37 PM' timestamp='1334687876' post='1397540']

Don´t beat arround the bush!

You will explain me that 2xAMD Radeon7970@1350-1800 and a Core i7 3960X@5.0GHz will have a lower minimum FPS as your I7 2600K@4.6GHz?

Source: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f153/unigine-heaven-3-0-benchmark-thread-mit-frameverlaeufen-877979-2.html#post18669638





I´m really sorry but i don´t belive your result! /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />





Honestly I don't give a hoot if you believe my result or not. It's legit & 100% correct. Also, if you were paying attention to the screenshots, you'd see he's running older drivers than I am (I'm running 12.4Betas, which are only available if you search & find them, because they aren't officially released yet by AMD, from the looks of it he's running 12.1 or 12.2 drivers). Driver refinements = higher lower FPS typically. You fail at reading. /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />



Also, doing things as simple as disabling Virus Scanner & In-Game/Bench Temps/stats display can increase your result a tiny bit in the Extreme Preset. Who knows what background processes he had running. I can tell you Processor makes almost no difference in the Extreme Preset. I've seen people with 5GHz Hexas lose to 4.5GHz Hexas, simply because the Extreme Preset cares more about GPU clocks than anything else.



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#11
Posted 04/17/2012 09:31 PM   
WindHund80, So you say HB is being dishonest, there stands a brave man, take my advice and retract that statement I can assure you its genuine.
WindHund80, So you say HB is being dishonest, there stands a brave man, take my advice and retract that statement I can assure you its genuine.

Image







Asus Rampage III Extreme, Intel i7 980X @4.6 ghz 24/7 1.39v, 6 GB Dom GT CL7, Tri channel, EK'd Asus GTX 680 Sli , Displays : 3 X Hanns-G HG281D 2D Surround, Case, Xigmatek Elysium, Corsair AX 1200W, Win 7 64, 2 x Crucial C300 128gb 6gb/s SSDs Raid 0, 2 x 300 gig WD velociraptors Raid 0, 64 GB Crucial M4 non raid boot drive 6 g/bs, Asus Xonar DX2 Sound, Roccat Kave 5:1 Headset, Track IR Pro, Noctua and TFC Triebwewrk fans controled by Lamptron FC6 black and Zalman ZM-FC1Plus black, Roccat Isku K/B, Steelseries Sensei mouse, Logitech G27 wheel, Custom water cooling, EK FB RE3 full board block , Black Ice GTX 480 Extreme Quad, Black Ice GTX Extreme 360, both rads running TFC Triebwerk mid speeds, Dual loop 3 D5 pumps.

#12
Posted 04/17/2012 10:05 PM   
Here's another one for you to gawk at the awesomeness of, OCed TriFire:

[URL=http://s729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/?action=view&current=Heaven3-3x7970s-1150-1550-147point3fps.jpg][IMG]http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/MynxNess84/7970s/th_Heaven3-3x7970s-1150-1550-147point3fps.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

FPS: 147.3 :-P
Here's another one for you to gawk at the awesomeness of, OCed TriFire:



Image



FPS: 147.3 :-P



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#13
Posted 04/21/2012 03:08 PM   
2 GTX 680s SLID UP
[IMG]http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a72/boost40oz/evga.jpg[/IMG]
2 GTX 680s SLID UP

Image

#14
Posted 04/21/2012 08:30 PM   
[quote name='Boost40oz' date='21 April 2012 - 02:30 PM' timestamp='1335040219' post='1399208']
2 GTX 680s SLID UP
[IMG]http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a72/boost40oz/evga.jpg[/IMG]
[/quote]

Tessellation DISABLED... and your readout covers up whether or not 8xAA was even used... why is that? The whole point of Heaven 3.0 is Tessellation testing imo, why would you even run it with Tessellation disabled? lol
[quote name='Boost40oz' date='21 April 2012 - 02:30 PM' timestamp='1335040219' post='1399208']

2 GTX 680s SLID UP

Image





Tessellation DISABLED... and your readout covers up whether or not 8xAA was even used... why is that? The whole point of Heaven 3.0 is Tessellation testing imo, why would you even run it with Tessellation disabled? lol



Image


Image

Help fight Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease by donating unused CPU and GPU power to Stanford University's Research Folding@Home projects:

Simplest method is to setup the FAH v7 client with this Windows Installation Guide

#15
Posted 04/22/2012 06:57 AM   
  1 / 2    
Scroll To Top