Can I run Skyrim on low?
Hello I just got Skyrim but it lags too much so I'am going to buy: SAPPHIRE 100323L [u]Radeon HD 6570[/u] 1GB DDR3 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
A real nice person named seyfertsuki helped me but i want to make sure that my computer can run it efficiently.

CPU speed: 2.3 GHz
RAM: 4.5 GB
OS: Window Vista 32 bit
Video Card: GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 (right now)
Max Watts: 300
Monitor Resolution: 1650 x 1050

I have a spare PCI Express x16 video card slot.
Also I'm wondering can this new video card (Radeon HD 6570) give me ~60 FPS in Skyrim with low-med settings?
Hello I just got Skyrim but it lags too much so I'am going to buy: SAPPHIRE 100323L Radeon HD 6570 1GB DDR3 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

A real nice person named seyfertsuki helped me but i want to make sure that my computer can run it efficiently.



CPU speed: 2.3 GHz

RAM: 4.5 GB

OS: Window Vista 32 bit

Video Card: GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 (right now)

Max Watts: 300

Monitor Resolution: 1650 x 1050



I have a spare PCI Express x16 video card slot.

Also I'm wondering can this new video card (Radeon HD 6570) give me ~60 FPS in Skyrim with low-med settings?

#1
Posted 01/07/2012 03:25 AM   
Hello again. /happy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':happy:' />

I've done a little bit more research and it turns out the GT 440 may be your better option.

EDIT: Wrong link. Will post one in a bit.
Hello again. /happy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':happy:' />



I've done a little bit more research and it turns out the GT 440 may be your better option.



EDIT: Wrong link. Will post one in a bit.

GeForce® 560 Ti Designed and Built by NVIDIA®

#2
Posted 01/07/2012 03:45 AM   
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='06 January 2012 - 07:45 PM' timestamp='1325907910' post='1352695']
Hello again. /happy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':happy:' />

I've done a little bit more research and it turns out the GT 440 may be your better option.

EDIT: Wrong link. Will post one in a bit.
[/quote]
Hmm okay thanks but which one should i get?
eVGA GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 1 GB - DDR3 SDRAM vs. ZOTAC GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 512 MB - GDDR5 SDRAM?

Thanks again lol /tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':tongue:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' />
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='06 January 2012 - 07:45 PM' timestamp='1325907910' post='1352695']

Hello again. /happy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':happy:' />



I've done a little bit more research and it turns out the GT 440 may be your better option.



EDIT: Wrong link. Will post one in a bit.



Hmm okay thanks but which one should i get?

eVGA GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 1 GB - DDR3 SDRAM vs. ZOTAC GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 512 MB - GDDR5 SDRAM?



Thanks again lol /tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':tongue:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' />

#3
Posted 01/07/2012 03:50 AM   
[quote name='NoobTechie' date='07 January 2012 - 03:50 AM' timestamp='1325908253' post='1352697']
Hmm okay thanks but which one should i get?
eVGA GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 1 GB - DDR3 SDRAM vs. ZOTAC GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 512 MB - GDDR5 SDRAM?

Thanks again lol /tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':tongue:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' />
[/quote]
GDDR5 is faster than DDR3. Overall performance would be better. It has half the memory though.

The reason why I chimed is, at least on Newegg.com, there are no GDDR5 based Radeon HD 6570s in stock. If you can find one somewhere else, it is marginally the better card.
[quote name='NoobTechie' date='07 January 2012 - 03:50 AM' timestamp='1325908253' post='1352697']

Hmm okay thanks but which one should i get?

eVGA GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 1 GB - DDR3 SDRAM vs. ZOTAC GeForce GT 440 Graphics card - 512 MB - GDDR5 SDRAM?



Thanks again lol /tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':tongue:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' />



GDDR5 is faster than DDR3. Overall performance would be better. It has half the memory though.



The reason why I chimed is, at least on Newegg.com, there are no GDDR5 based Radeon HD 6570s in stock. If you can find one somewhere else, it is marginally the better card.

GeForce® 560 Ti Designed and Built by NVIDIA®

#4
Posted 01/07/2012 04:07 AM   
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='06 January 2012 - 08:07 PM' timestamp='1325909250' post='1352699']
GDDR5 is faster than DDR3. Overall performance would be better. It has half the memory though.

The reason why I chimed is, at least on Newegg.com, there are no GDDR5 based Radeon HD 6570s in stock. If you can find one somewhere else, it is marginally the better card.
[/quote]
okay thanks xD
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='06 January 2012 - 08:07 PM' timestamp='1325909250' post='1352699']

GDDR5 is faster than DDR3. Overall performance would be better. It has half the memory though.



The reason why I chimed is, at least on Newegg.com, there are no GDDR5 based Radeon HD 6570s in stock. If you can find one somewhere else, it is marginally the better card.



okay thanks xD

#5
Posted 01/07/2012 04:13 AM   
Okay. After doing a couple hours of research on this (in the spoiler), here's the gist of it.

On the high end of the spectrum:
1 GB DDR3 HD 6570: [i]Stronger core (5.2 GP/s|15.6 GT/s)/lower memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s)[/i] [color="#FF0000"]Bottleneck at high/very high resolutions[/color]
1 GB GDDR5 GT 440: [i]Weaker core (3.2 GP/s|13.2 GT/s)/higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s)[/i] [color="#FF0000"]Bottleneck at higher detail[/color]

On the low end of the spectrum:
1 GB DDR3 GT 520: [i]Stronger core (3.24 GP/s|6.48 GT/s)/lower memory bandwidth (14.4 GB/s)[/i] [color="#FF0000"]Bottleneck at medium/high resolutions[/color]
1 GB DDR3 GT 430: [i]Weaker core (2.8 GP/s|5.6 GT/s)/higher memory bandwidth (22.8 GB/s)[/i] [color="#FF0000"]Bottleneck at higher detail[/color]

It looks like there wasn't much reason to stop you anyway. /haha.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' />

[spoiler]I've found some 1GB GDDR5 GT 440s. Two great brands too. Aside from eBay, no 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570s in sight.

[url="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121426"]ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133378"]PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.directron.com/engt440di1gd5.html"]ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT440 1GB PCI Express 2.0 x16 Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=465549&CatId=3669"]PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=7280354&CatId=3669"]ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 Video Card[/url]

Here's a nice article comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB DDR3 GT 440. /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />

[url="http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/GeForce-GT-440-512-MB-GDDR5-vs-1-GB-DDR3-Video-Card-Review/1272/1"]GeForce GT 440 512 MB GDDR5 vs. 1 GB DDR3 Video Card Review[/url]

I also found a synthetic benchmark graph comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570. If you can make it out through the watermark, you can see that the HD 6570 is better.

[url="http://www.3dfxzone.it/images/?object=news14970_1.jpg"]Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon HD 6570 vs GeForce GT 440[/url]

Oh, and here's a review as well. It has both versions of the GT 440 from the earlier review competing against it although I'm not sure where the 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 falls in. From what I've read, I'd say it's similar in performance to a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.

[url="http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/AMD-Radeon-HD-6570-512-MB-Video-Card-Review/1271/1"]AMD Radeon HD 6570 512 MB Video Card Review[/url]
[/spoiler]
Okay. After doing a couple hours of research on this (in the spoiler), here's the gist of it.



On the high end of the spectrum:

1 GB DDR3 HD 6570: Stronger core (5.2 GP/s|15.6 GT/s)/lower memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s) Bottleneck at high/very high resolutions

1 GB GDDR5 GT 440: Weaker core (3.2 GP/s|13.2 GT/s)/higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s) Bottleneck at higher detail



On the low end of the spectrum:

1 GB DDR3 GT 520: Stronger core (3.24 GP/s|6.48 GT/s)/lower memory bandwidth (14.4 GB/s) Bottleneck at medium/high resolutions

1 GB DDR3 GT 430: Weaker core (2.8 GP/s|5.6 GT/s)/higher memory bandwidth (22.8 GB/s) Bottleneck at higher detail



It looks like there wasn't much reason to stop you anyway. /haha.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' />



[spoiler]I've found some 1GB GDDR5 GT 440s. Two great brands too. Aside from eBay, no 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570s in sight.



ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT440 1GB PCI Express 2.0 x16 Video Card

PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 Video Card

ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 Video Card



Here's a nice article comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB DDR3 GT 440. /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />



GeForce GT 440 512 MB GDDR5 vs. 1 GB DDR3 Video Card Review



I also found a synthetic benchmark graph comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570. If you can make it out through the watermark, you can see that the HD 6570 is better.



Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon HD 6570 vs GeForce GT 440



Oh, and here's a review as well. It has both versions of the GT 440 from the earlier review competing against it although I'm not sure where the 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 falls in. From what I've read, I'd say it's similar in performance to a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.



AMD Radeon HD 6570 512 MB Video Card Review

[/spoiler]

GeForce® 560 Ti Designed and Built by NVIDIA®

#6
Posted 01/07/2012 04:41 AM   
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='06 January 2012 - 08:41 PM' timestamp='1325911315' post='1352708']
Okay. After doing a couple hours of research on this (in the spoiler), here's the gist of it.

First off, don't consider buying a 1 GB DDR3 GT 440, it is the slowest per dollar.
I would invest in a card with at least 1 GB memory on-board. At this level of performance, any more than that is a waste.
A 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570 is hard to find (outside of eBay), it is the fastest per dollar and costs about the same as a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.
A 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 is similar in performance to a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440 and it's more bang-for-buck.
Depending on your budget or preference, get either a 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 or a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.

1 GB DDR3 HD 6570: [i]Stronger core (5.2 GP/s|15.6 GT/s)/lower memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s)[/i] [color="#FF0000"]Bottleneck at higher resolutions[/color]
1 GB GDDR5 GT 440: [i]Weaker core (3.2 GP/s|13.2 GT/s)/higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s)[/i] [color="#FF0000"]Bottleneck at higher detail[/color]

It looks like there wasn't much reason to stop you anyway. /haha.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' />

[spoiler]I've found some 1GB GDDR5 GT 440s. Two great brands too. Aside from eBay, no 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570s in sight.

[url="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121426"]ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133378"]PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.directron.com/engt440di1gd5.html"]ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT440 1GB PCI Express 2.0 x16 Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=465549&CatId=3669"]PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 Video Card[/url]
[url="http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=7280354&CatId=3669"]ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 Video Card[/url]

Here's a nice article comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB DDR3 GT 440. /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />

[url="http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/GeForce-GT-440-512-MB-GDDR5-vs-1-GB-DDR3-Video-Card-Review/1272/1"]GeForce GT 440 512 MB GDDR5 vs. 1 GB DDR3 Video Card Review[/url]

I also found a synthetic benchmark graph comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570. If you can make it out through the watermark, you can see that the HD 6570 is better.

[url="http://www.3dfxzone.it/images/?object=news14970_1.jpg"]Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon HD 6570 vs GeForce GT 440[/url]

Oh, and here's a review as well. It has both versions of the GT 440 from the earlier review competing against it although I'm not sure where the 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 falls in. From what I've read, I'd say it's similar in performance to a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.

[url="http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/AMD-Radeon-HD-6570-512-MB-Video-Card-Review/1271/1"]AMD Radeon HD 6570 512 MB Video Card Review[/url]
[/spoiler]
[/quote]
Whoa! that is a lot of information /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' /> but which one should i get? Can you pick one for me since you know a lot. I don't care about how much i need to spend. As long as it is below $130. Again Thank you so much. /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' />

Hmmm I'm thinking of buying the SAPPHIRE 100323L Radeon HD 6570 1GB DDR3 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card for 60 bucks
Is this a good idea?
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='06 January 2012 - 08:41 PM' timestamp='1325911315' post='1352708']

Okay. After doing a couple hours of research on this (in the spoiler), here's the gist of it.



First off, don't consider buying a 1 GB DDR3 GT 440, it is the slowest per dollar.

I would invest in a card with at least 1 GB memory on-board. At this level of performance, any more than that is a waste.

A 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570 is hard to find (outside of eBay), it is the fastest per dollar and costs about the same as a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.

A 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 is similar in performance to a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440 and it's more bang-for-buck.

Depending on your budget or preference, get either a 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 or a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.



1 GB DDR3 HD 6570: Stronger core (5.2 GP/s|15.6 GT/s)/lower memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s) Bottleneck at higher resolutions

1 GB GDDR5 GT 440: Weaker core (3.2 GP/s|13.2 GT/s)/higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s) Bottleneck at higher detail



It looks like there wasn't much reason to stop you anyway. /haha.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' />



[spoiler]I've found some 1GB GDDR5 GT 440s. Two great brands too. Aside from eBay, no 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570s in sight.



ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 (Fermi) 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT440 1GB PCI Express 2.0 x16 Video Card

PNY VCGGT4401XPB GeForce GT 440 Video Card

ASUS ENGT440/DI/1GD5 GeForce GT 440 Video Card



Here's a nice article comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB DDR3 GT 440. /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />



GeForce GT 440 512 MB GDDR5 vs. 1 GB DDR3 Video Card Review



I also found a synthetic benchmark graph comparing a 512 MB GDDR5 GT 440 and a 1 GB GDDR5 HD 6570. If you can make it out through the watermark, you can see that the HD 6570 is better.



Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon HD 6570 vs GeForce GT 440



Oh, and here's a review as well. It has both versions of the GT 440 from the earlier review competing against it although I'm not sure where the 1 GB DDR3 HD 6570 falls in. From what I've read, I'd say it's similar in performance to a 1 GB GDDR5 GT 440.



AMD Radeon HD 6570 512 MB Video Card Review

[/spoiler]



Whoa! that is a lot of information /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' /> but which one should i get? Can you pick one for me since you know a lot. I don't care about how much i need to spend. As long as it is below $130. Again Thank you so much. /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' /> /thanks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thanks:' />



Hmmm I'm thinking of buying the SAPPHIRE 100323L Radeon HD 6570 1GB DDR3 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card for 60 bucks

Is this a good idea?

#7
Posted 01/07/2012 07:32 AM   
I updated my previous post. It seemed like too much info. /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />

That would be a good buy. You're not asking to do anything too demanding on it, so it should be plenty. There's a chance you may not benefit from [i]all[/i] of the GPU's ability, but since you're telling me you can get it for ~$60, that's a no-brainer. That sits right in the middle of the price range of the far less powerful GT 520 or GT 430. If that isn't a bang-for-buck, I don't know what is. /haha.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' />
I updated my previous post. It seemed like too much info. /wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' />



That would be a good buy. You're not asking to do anything too demanding on it, so it should be plenty. There's a chance you may not benefit from all of the GPU's ability, but since you're telling me you can get it for ~$60, that's a no-brainer. That sits right in the middle of the price range of the far less powerful GT 520 or GT 430. If that isn't a bang-for-buck, I don't know what is. /haha.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' />

GeForce® 560 Ti Designed and Built by NVIDIA®

#8
Posted 01/07/2012 08:05 AM   
Back on topic, one of my earlier builds had an Opteron 185 @ 3 GHz and a OC'd GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB. Both were a bit more powerful than your CPU and GPU (probably by several FPS, if we were to gauge it that way), but I was able to average around 30 FPS on Crysis 1 with mostly High and some Very High settings @ 1280x1024. There were times it would lag (big shoot-outs) and times it would be smooth as silk (on the beach). That was a beast of a game back in 2008 and it would eat your system alive, if it wasn't good enough. I'd like to think Skyrim isn't nearly as graphically intensive though the game world is much larger than Crysis 1.
Back on topic, one of my earlier builds had an Opteron 185 @ 3 GHz and a OC'd GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB. Both were a bit more powerful than your CPU and GPU (probably by several FPS, if we were to gauge it that way), but I was able to average around 30 FPS on Crysis 1 with mostly High and some Very High settings @ 1280x1024. There were times it would lag (big shoot-outs) and times it would be smooth as silk (on the beach). That was a beast of a game back in 2008 and it would eat your system alive, if it wasn't good enough. I'd like to think Skyrim isn't nearly as graphically intensive though the game world is much larger than Crysis 1.

GeForce® 560 Ti Designed and Built by NVIDIA®

#9
Posted 01/07/2012 06:47 PM   
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='07 January 2012 - 10:47 AM' timestamp='1325962071' post='1352978']
Back on topic, one of my earlier builds had an Opteron 185 @ 3 GHz and a OC'd GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB. Both were a bit more powerful than your CPU and GPU (probably by several FPS, if we were to gauge it that way), but I was able to average around 30 FPS on Crysis 1 with mostly High and some Very High settings @ 1280x1024. There were times it would lag (big shoot-outs) and times it would be smooth as silk (on the beach). That was a beast of a game back in 2008 and it would eat your system alive, if it wasn't good enough. I'd like to think Skyrim isn't nearly as graphically intensive though the game world is much larger than Crysis 1.
[/quote]

Cool thanks, I already ordered the Radeon HD 6570 video card. It will be coming in 3 days. I will let you know how it works but I think Skyrim is less demanding then Crysis but then again i never played it. /unsure.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':unsure:' /> /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />
[quote name='seyfertsuki' date='07 January 2012 - 10:47 AM' timestamp='1325962071' post='1352978']

Back on topic, one of my earlier builds had an Opteron 185 @ 3 GHz and a OC'd GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB. Both were a bit more powerful than your CPU and GPU (probably by several FPS, if we were to gauge it that way), but I was able to average around 30 FPS on Crysis 1 with mostly High and some Very High settings @ 1280x1024. There were times it would lag (big shoot-outs) and times it would be smooth as silk (on the beach). That was a beast of a game back in 2008 and it would eat your system alive, if it wasn't good enough. I'd like to think Skyrim isn't nearly as graphically intensive though the game world is much larger than Crysis 1.





Cool thanks, I already ordered the Radeon HD 6570 video card. It will be coming in 3 days. I will let you know how it works but I think Skyrim is less demanding then Crysis but then again i never played it. /unsure.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':unsure:' /> /thumbup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbup:' />

#10
Posted 01/07/2012 09:39 PM   
Scroll To Top